1.7 million-year-old cottage startled the scientific community. It looks like cottage cottages some Africans during kini.Telah many findings which indicate that the age of Homo sapiens not earlier than 800 thousand years. One of them is the finding of Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gap. In this place, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus lived at the same time. Even more interesting is a building that is also found Leakey in the same layer. Here, Leakey discovered the remains of a stone hut. Unusual aspect of this event is that this building, which is still used in some parts of Africa, can only be built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern humans would live in the same period about 1.7 million years ago. These findings definitively the theory of evolution which states that modern humans evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus. because in fact they hidupa the same era.
Jejak manusia modern berusia 3,6 juta tahun
Laetoli traces derived from present-day humans, but they lived millions of years ago. In fact, a number of other findings trace the origin of modern humans of up to 1.7 million years ago. One of the most important findings is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania by Mary Leakey in 1977. The footprints were found in layers according to the calculation of 3.6 million years old. More importantly, the footprints are not different from the footprints left by modern humans (humans today). The footprints that Mary Leakey discovered and studied several such paleoanthropologist Don Johanson and Tim White. The results were similar. White writes: No doubt ... The traces were similar to modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year-old children were asked what, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He will not be able to differentiate it from a hundred other footprints on the beach, so did you. After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North Carolina this review: the curve is rather high - the smaller man berlengkungan taller than me-and the big toe and index finger parallel to the leg. ... The fingers hit the ground like the fingers human foot. You will not see this in animals. Tests of morphological traces still showed again that must be accepted that the human traces, moreover, modern humans existing today (Homo sapiens). Russell Tuttle, who studied this writing:
A small barefoot Homo sapiens may have been made ... Of all the morphological features observed, the feet of people who make the trail not unlike the human foot modern.Penelitian not neutral about the footprints revealed their real owners. In fact, traces of it consisted of 20 fossilized footprint of a modern man aged 10 years and 27 trace a younger man. They are clearly modern humans like us.
This situation made the Laetoli footprints as a subject of conversation for years. The evolutionist paleoanthropologist working hard to think of an explanation because they are difficult to accept the fact that modern humans had walked on the face of the Earth 3.6 million years ago. In the 1990s, the "explanation" is taking shape. The evolutionists decided that these footprints must be left by an Australopithecus, because according to their theory, it is impossible there homo species 3.6 million years ago. However, in his essay in 1990, Russell H. Tuttle wrote: In short, the footprints 3.5 million years old at the Laetoli site G resemble modern humans commonly tracks barefoot. There are no characteristics that indicate that the Laetoli hominids less capable bipeds than we are. If only traces in the G site is not known that old, we would immediately conclude that the trail was made by members of the genus Homo ... In this case, we must rule out a weak assumption that the Laetoli tracks made by Lucy's kind, namely Australopithecus aferensis.Dengan other words, the footprints 3.6 million years old could not have belonged to Australopithecus. The only reason why these tracks are ascribed to him being in the volcanic layer 3.6 million years old. Traces were ascribed to Australopithecus with the assumption that humans could not exist in the days of old.
Interpretations of Laetoli footprint showing us a very important fact. Evolutionists do not support his theory by weighing the scientific findings, even just ignore it. Here we have a theory that is blindly defended, and all who doubt the findings of the theory is ignored or twisted to support the theory. In short, the theory of evolution is not science, but dogma kept alive by ignoring science.
Aged Humans Jaw 2.3 Million Years
Another example that shows that skinfold-sahihan genealogy fabricated by evolutionists: the jaws of modern humans (Homo sapiens) lived 2.3 million years old. Jaw is coded AL 666-1 was unearthed in Hadar, Ethiopia. Evolutionist publications try to reduce its meaning by referring to it as "a very surprising finding." (D. Johanson, BlakeEdgar, From Lucy to Language, p. 169)
Manusia hobbit
Recently discovered in Indonesia in the bones 18,000 years old belong to human kind with heights of 3 feet on the island of Flores, Indonesia. Human Hobbits, so scientists and the media called it. has a characteristic feature of the smaller in humans in general. Human hobbit discovery raises a dispute between ilmuwa. the dispute is the existence of other experts who support the views of Indonesian scientists who object to H. floresiensis as a separate species from Homo sapiens. Leading scientists from a range of Australian scientists is Dr. Maciej Henneberg and Dr. Alan Thorne, and researchers from Chicago's Field Museum in America.
The new objections, as expressed by the Indonesian scientists, confirmed that Flores Man may have suffered neurological disease known as microcephaly (disorders of the head are small). Secondary microcephaly has many causes, ranging from viral infections during pregnancy to injury or malnutrition shortly after birth. The specimens were discovered in a cave on an island. Who is to say that the island had not been hit by virus outbreak 18,000 years ago which caused an outbreak of the condition? Or perhaps the inhabitants of [the island] has been hit by the outbreak elsewhere in the Indonesian archipelago, and has been banished to Flores because of their odd appearance.
Or it may be that those who develop secondary microcephaly could survive and even breed: the condition is not necessarily associated with low intelligence. Actually, [the intelligence] is not due to the small brain size: the most important is the amount of [brain-colored] gray. Because this is not preserved in the fossil remnants, we have no idea whether the "hobbits" were bright, ignorant or indifferent. What is clear is that palaeontologists are worryingly keen to base big claims on evidence that has been meager. This is a trend that has not helped them in the past.
Another study by Henneberg that revealed striking results regarding Flores Man was his calculations regarding a forearm bone (radius) are found in a cave. Of long bones, which is defined as 210 mm (8.3 inches), Henneberg calculated that the owner plays the body between 151 and 162 cm (4.9 to 5.3 feet). This figure is slightly greater than 1 meter (3 feet) which is suspected to Flores Man, and still within the limits considered normal for people of today. Henneberg announced the conclusion which he achieved as a result of this research:
"Until additional bones other than 'new species' allegations was found, I will still state that a condition that is very well known penyakitlah caused by the specific cause of the appearance of such order."
0 comments:
Post a Comment